A federal judge has dismissed the Pennsylvania trial of US President Donald Trump’s campaign to invalidate millions of votes. Pennsylvania Intermediate District Judge Matthew Brann on Saturday dismissed an injunction request in the Pennsylvania case, which was a major setback to the outgoing president’s efforts to challenge the November 3 election results, which the Democrat won. . presidential candidate Joe Biden.
Judge Brann, who alleged a few days ago that she had received harassing phone calls, ruled that the Trump campaign “presented strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations that were not supported by evidence” .
“In the United States of America, that cannot justify the denial of the right to vote of just one voter, let alone all voters in its sixth most populous state. Our people, our laws and our institutions demand more, ”wrote the judge dismissing the Trump campaign lawsuit earlier this month, alleging irregularities in the voting process.
In her scathing opinion, Judge Brann said the Trump campaign had asked the court to “deprive” nearly seven million voters. “This court has not been able to find a case in which a plaintiff has requested such a radical recourse in the context of contesting an election, in terms of the volume of votes whose invalidation is requested”, a she declared.
“One would expect that, in pursuing such a surprising outcome, a plaintiff would be formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual evidence of rampant corruption, so that this tribunal would have no choice but to ‘unfortunately grant the proposed injunctive measure despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens,’ said the judge.
President-elect Biden leads by more than 81,000 votes in Pennsylvania, a battlefield state with 20 constituency seats. Rudy Giuliani, attorney for President Trump and Jenna Ellis, senior legal adviser to the 2020 Trump campaign, in a joint statement, said the decision by a Pennsylvania federal court was found to help the Trump campaign in its strategy to surrender. quickly in the United States Supreme Court. .
“While we strongly disagree with this opinion, we are grateful to the Obama-appointed judge for making this early ruling quickly, rather than just trying to run out of time,” they said.
“We will be looking for an expedited appeal to the third circuit. There is so much evidence that in Pennsylvania, Democrats ruled out our ability to present 50 witnesses and other evidence that election officials blatantly ignored Pennsylvania law denying independent review, ”they said.
Thus, 682,777 ballots were cast illegally, voluntarily or involuntarily. This is just an extension of “the censorship of the Big Tech, the Big Media, the corrupt Democrats on damning facts” that the American public needs to know, Giuliani and Ellis said.
“We are disappointed that at least we did not have the opportunity to present our evidence at a hearing. Unfortunately, the censorship continues. We hope Third Circuit will be as courteous as Judge Brann in deciding our appeal. “one way or another so quickly. This is another case that seems to move quickly before the United States Supreme Court,” they said.
The Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under the law, the organization that intervened in the case, said the court’s verdict dealt another blow to the president’s attempts to undermine the decisive 2020 election results in the Commonwealth.
“This should put the nail in the coffin on any further attempt by President Trump to use federal courts to rewrite the 2020 election result,” said Kristen Clarke, chair and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law .
“The tribunal could not be clearer in pointing out the baseless and unfounded nature of the claims made in this case. Voters across the Commonwealth have overcome tremendous hurdles to make their voices heard and this lawsuit has sought to rob them of their right to vote without a scintilla of evidence, ”Clarke said.
The Trump campaign had asked the court to order the Pennsylvania State Department not to certify its presidential election results because some counties contacted and allowed voters to correct errors in their mail-in ballot returns, while others did not. Brann J. rejected these arguments.
“The tribunal saw through attempts by President Trump and his facilitators in Washington and Harrisburg to interfere with democracy,” said Reggie Shuford, executive director of the Pennsylvania ACLU. “The people of Pennsylvania had their say, and it is time to put this election behind us,” she said.